Harlem Hippies Review (4 Takes)

Matt Helgeson (Game Informer, Unknown Prophets, Maps of Norway)Â 65/100
Iâm assuming Harlem was joking when they titled this album Hippies; most of what I hear sounds like stuff that came before hippies (â50s teen dance ballads, tuff Nuggets garage bands) or afterhippies (Buzzcocks, the Undertones, Greg Cartwright). For the first time in years, thereâs a underground of bands in American indie that can actually be described as ârock nâ rollâ, and Harlem follows in the footsteps of acts like the Exploding Hearts, Jay Reatard, King Kahn & BBQ, and Black Lips.
This stuff is derivative by nature, so lets not touch originality issue. When it comes down to it, you either have the tunes or you donât. Harlem does â at least 70 percent of the time by my math. As musicians, they arenât any great shakes. I canât tell if I think the rickety, little-engine-that-could musicianship is charming or I just wish they would, like, practice more. Still, theyâve got hooks and an impressive number of bridges (pop songwritingâs secret weapon). They invest some real passion into their stoned nonsense, screaming âMy basketball teamâs name is Gay Human Bonesâ and âOh yeah, whatever, that sounds coolâ as if their young lives depended on it. At least Iâm assuming theyâre young; they manage to sound both jaded and naĂŻve, bored and overexcited in a way that only really works in your early twenties.
Five years from now, Harlem probably will be hippies; todayâs garage punks are tomorrowâs Byrds/Dead revivalists. Iâm not sure Iâll still be listening to this album, but thatâs okay. Teenage kicks werenât meant to last forever.
Chris Besinger (STNNG)Â Â 71.98775/100
Here we have some sun-baked, semi-shambolic 60âs pop, blessed with a couple legit catchy tunes and check it out, they have a bass player! Thank god, based on the cover I thought it was going to be another two-piece thing the kids are such a fan of these days. Also, the production isnât self-consciously lo-fi and at the same time isnât a hot digital mess, like I can identify instruments and voices and stuff, bonus, A plus for bucking trends. The rhythm section has a pretty light (sloppy) touch and the guitar is jangly as all hell but it certainly serves the music. The album starts strong, but over the course of 16 songs the bandâs relentlessly upbeat and breezy style starts to grate. Still, at least a couple of these songs are basically undeniable, âSomeday Soonâ and âGay Human Bonesâ in particular and the band definitely has a confident way about them, even if the sound isnât particularly original, I mean who cares at this point, Harlem pulls it off. Even when I was kind of groaning at something or the other, they were pulling me back in. Next though give me a couple more tunes like âSunset Stripperâ and weâll call it even.”
72/100
I donât really have many profound thoughts on Harlemâs new album. On one hand itâs a great catchy, upbeat mess of sloppily played garage rock and nonsensical lyricism that would make a great soundtrack to any backyard bbq, pool party, or game of mailbox baseball. On the other, once anyone starts to listen too closely the album doesnât really stand up to scrutiny well. The jangly guitar riffs start to sound the same from song to song with only a few key left hand turns (introspective surf waltz âThree Legged Dogâ and punky âStripper Sunsetâ). Vocalist Michael Coomersâ mushmouth lyrics also tend to sort of run together after awhile too â not helped by the fact that you can hardly understand him most of the time. As a live band I like Harlem a lot â theyâre energy is infectious and their fast and loose playing goes over well under the influence of a moderate beer buzz. At least in Hippies case though the scrutiny of studio recording hasnât done them any favors.
68/100
As a big fan of garage rock and a moderate fan of Harlem’s last record, Free Drugs, I still found myself underwhelmed by their latest output Hippies. I wonder if there is a case of idea burnout, with the band failing to reach the heights of the first song that brought them attention, Free Drug’s great track âSouth of France.â Starting with âSomeday Soonâ and spreading throughout the 16 track album, the group doesn’t do much to differentiate themselves from other similar bands on their first record for Matador. Their flower power, druggy psych garage rock is good in doses, but grows more distant and hollow upon closer inspection, with little desire on my part for repeated listens. While I don’t mind the album, it isn’t something that is going to find its way into my rotation, even if it is the type of album that on paper I would generally love.
Writer / co-founder




